Repeat Of AVP but this time in a proper inhabited town
Aliens Vs Predator was terrible as a massive fan boy I still enjoyed bits of it, but it was never and will be never a good film.
AVP 2 I thought was going to be even worse but despite this I felt it was OK. Not great but certainately watchable (especially if your a fan).
The main problem is a lone predator is dispatched (why is a mystery?)to sort out many aliens (cheaper effects wise) granted, but still it cheapens the menance that is the alien. Also aliens go toe-to-toe with the predator too much (not it's advantage I think). Still the inclusion of small town America was a good idea as it has long been thought about the damage they could cause on Earth.
Having said the film was enjoyable! Death scenes were a bit routine at times and too little emphasis placed on character development (not surprising given very short run time- less then 90 mins)
Much better than the first AVP. But unfortunately still lacking a lot from either great predecessors. Worth a watch though.
Thank You
Yet another Video game tie-in from Uwe Boll (Vampires this time)
Well Uwe Boll is nothing short of brilliant. He is consistency personified. The German director has alreay done Alone in The dark amongst his movie tie-in/horror career and this doesn't dissapoint either, being completely upto his usual standard.
Which is of course to say that the movie is absoloute and unmitaged tripe from start to finish! This film is so bad you should be able to sue for lack of entertainment. It is obvious, badly scripted (ridiculous speeches made to cast but obviously just a terrible narrative)I am a huge horror fan and love lots of vampire films (even the first Blade movie)
The cast seem and act bored, and badly throughout most of it. The action is there but nothing new not even once did I stop yawning. the only reason this is not condemned to 1 - 10 is that under 90 mins means at least it isn't wasting too much of your life.
The biggest achievement Uwe Boll can claim is how he gets the casts he does i.e Ben Kingsley , Christian Slater etc. Please Hollywood the world implores you never let this buffoon helm another film again.
Thank You
main parody of The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.
an Upcoming Film with 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 Movies released and made by Columbia Pictures, Rated R.
Juno MacGuff (Ellen Page) is the smart aleck teenager that we all somehow seem to end up living with. She is much more endearing on the big screen than in real life. Juno, written by Diablo Cody, is a comedy about a serious subject – teen pregnancy. Filled with sarcastically funny one-liners, it had me laughing out loud at some points, chuckling quietly at others and at least smiling throughout.
After a not so impulsive decision to have unprotected sex with her friend Paulie Bleeker (Michael Cera), Juno discovers that she is pregnant. She is immediately confronted with important decisions that she faces head on. Her short-lived decision to have an abortion ends after she learns that her unborn child has fingernails. When she informs her best friend Leah (Olivia Thirlby) that she has changed her mind, Leah helps her find adoptive parents for the baby in the local PennySaver. That done, she tells her parents Mac (J. K. Simmons) and Bren (Allison Janney) that she is pregnant and giving the baby up for adoption.
In this age of helicopter parenting, Mac and Bren are a breath of fresh air. They are the parents everybody wants but few get. They allow Juno to make her own decisions and then respect and support those decisions. Their reaction to Juno’s news is remarkably calm, “I was hoping she was expelled, or into hard drugs.” Bren ensures that Juno gets the medical care she needs, and demands the respect she deserves. She tells off an x-ray technician who looks down on Juno and her situation, “My five year old daughter could do that and let me tell you, she's not the brightest bulb in the tanning bed.” Mac takes Juno to meet the adoptive parents and discuss the adoption process.
The adoptive parents, Mark and Vanessa Loring (Jason Bateman and Jennifer Garner), live in a subdivision called Glacial Valley Estates, an hour away by car and light years away from the life Juno knows. Their yuppie existence in a large, beautifully decorated McMansion is a far cry from the MacGuff family’s small, crowded home filled with mismatched furniture, knick knacks, family photos and of all things, a hamburger phone. Juno believes she has found the perfect couple to raise the baby. As is usually the case, all is not as it seems, and Juno eventually discovers that, “I never realize how much I like being home unless I've been somewhere really different for a while.”
Directed by Jason Reitman, Juno takes a difficult subject and deals with it sans the drama. There is no weeping or wailing, no yelling, no fighting in Juno. Cody’s writing kept me entertained with witty dialogue and touching scenes. She made me care about this woman/child and the difficulties she was facing. Throughout this movie, Juno is surrounded by friends and family that offer sincere and unconditional love. What more could anyone, including that smart aleck teenager, want?
This movie contains a lots of action in it but really interesting.
I think the movie is absolutely full of action, and very interesting. A very few(1 or 2)scenes are a bit boring but not that much that a person switches off the T.V.
A small group of survivors in a post-apocalyptic world take refuge in an empty hospital with plans on re-building society. When they rescue a survivor, they fi. the gure out that she is a leader of savage cannabals nick- named the Rovers.
Welcome to my weekly movie review. this week i am reviwing Tooth And Nail part of Horrorfest 2007 starring Rachel Miner. Rated R. Now im a big fan of these horrorfest movies. But this one was pretty bad. I have 3 reasons why this movie was bad.
1: The plot is that what happens when the world runs out of gasoline. now i just did not get that. its like saying: The world is out of gas!!! we must kill others for food!!! now thats dumb.
2: The charecters in this movie have weird names. like Viper, Kie, Dexter, and things like that. the Rovers had weird names to.
3: WARNING SPOILER!!!!!! The ending should of had a twist. the only survivors from the rovers were a crazy woman and a retarded girl. in the middle of the movie, the girl locks one of the Rovers in a freezer. in the end the crazy woman says: When cilivsation is no longer here to protect us, we will fight tooth and nail to survive. when she was saying that, it showed the door to the freezer, and the rover just popped up, looked out the window, and just went HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASHHAHAAHAHAH!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!! MWHAHAHAHAHA!! and then the movie just ended. i dont know what he was laughing about. i did not know if he had a plan to escape, or if he was going crazy.
Tooth And Nail= Bad
Check out my next movie review of Lake Dead: Horrorfest 2007
see ya
Bullshit actors find themselves playing bullshit cat and mouse with a bullshit killer
Oh my dear jesus god, please let the world end tomorrow if this is how movies are going to be! Hasn't hollywood done the whole split personality killer thing to death? isn't that plot twist as unoriginal as a kate hudson movie? we might as well churn out another japanese vengeful ghost story.
Guy copes with breakup from long time girlfriend.
Although there were some humorous moments throughout the movie, I believe it should have been rated X and listed as pornography.
people trying to survive monster rampaging through NY city
this movie SUCKED!!!!! to begin with it was only 84 min. long. second of all an actor was holding the video camera for the ENTIRE movie(kind of like The Blare Witch Project).third, the first 20+ minutes was just random shots at a party. forth, you maybe only see the monster for 10 + minutes of the movie total.
the only good parts of the movie were the special effects including the monster and his little buddies but you only get to see them for maybe 10-15 minutes of movie so if you want to see a really good 10-15 minute movie this one is for you
DONT WAIST YOUR MONEY ON IT
3rd time not the charm?
While I thought Spiderman 3 had some good moments they were really offset by the horrific musical numbers that someone thought were a good idea. Starting an action movie without some type of action set piece is just not the way to go. The acotrs all do a good job again but there are way to many stories going on for us to really care about any one of them. Did we really need venom and sandman and the new goblin all in the same movie? I think not. But the action we do get is terrific and carries the film even through the rough points. So I will give this one 10 out of 10 stars but with some reservations. For more info check out this video review.
http://www.expotv.com/videos/reviews/15/150/Spider-Man-3/201951
